Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Vadose Zone Journal Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chung, C.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, C.-P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Apparent Dielectric Constant and Effective Frequency of TDR Measurements: Influencing Factors and Comparison

C.-C. Chung and C.-P. Lin*

Dep. of Civil Engineering, National Chiao Tung Univ., Hsinchu, Taiwan

Correspondence: * Corresponding author (cplin{at}mail.nctu.edu.tw).

Received for publication 8 May 2008. When measuring soil water content by time domain reflectometry (TDR), several methods are available for determining the related apparent dielectric constant (Ka) from the TDR waveform. Their influencing factors and effective frequencies have not been extensively investigated and results obtained from different methods have not been critically compared. The purpose of this study was to use numerical simulations to systematically investigate the effects of electrical conductivity, cable length, and dielectric dispersion on Ka and the associated effective frequency. Not only does the dielectric dispersion significantly affect the measured Ka, it also plays an important role in how Ka is affected by the electrical conductivity and cable length. Three methods for determining Ka were compared, including the dual tangent, single tangent, and derivative methods. Their effective frequencies were carefully examined with emphasis on whether the effects of electrical conductivity, cable length, and dielectric dispersion can be accounted for by the estimated effective frequency. The results show that there is no consistent trend between the change in Ka and the change in effective frequency as the influencing factors vary. Compensating the effects of electrical conductivity, cable length, and dielectric dispersion by the effective frequency seems theoretically infeasible. To improve the accuracy of TDR soil water content measurements in the face of these influencing factors, future studies are recommended toward TDR dielectric spectroscopy or developing signal processing techniques for determining the dielectric permittivity near the optimal frequency range.

Abbreviations: EC, electrical conductivity • TDR, time domain reflectometry







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Soil Science Society of America