Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Singh, P. Articles by Morse, J. R. GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Winter Hydrologic and Erosion Processes in the U.S. Palouse Region: Field Experimentation and WEPP Simulation

^a Dep. of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
^b USDA-ARS, Land Management and Water Conservation, Pullman, WA 99164
^c Chung Hua Institution for Economic Research, Taipei, Taiwan. Mention of commercial products does not imply endorsement by the authors

Correspondence: ^* Corresponding author (prabhakar_singh{at}wsu.edu).

Received for publication 8 March 2008. Soil erosion by water is detrimental to soil fertility, crop yield, and the environment. For cold areas, knowledge of winter hydrologic processes is critical to determining land-use and management practices for reducing soil loss and protecting land and water resources. Adequate understanding of winter processes is also essential to developing models as effective predictive tools. This study evaluated the effects of two contrasting tillage practices on winter hydrologic and erosion processes, and the suitability of the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model with a newly implemented energy-budget-based winter routine for quantifying these processes. Research plots subject to two tillage treatments—continuous tilled bare fallow (CTBF) and no-till (NT) seeding of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Madsen) after spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)—were established at the USDA-ARS Palouse Conservation Field Station, Pullman, WA. The plots were monitored for runoff, erosion, soil temperature, water content, and depths of snow and freeze–thaw during October to May of 2003–2004 through 2006–2007. The NT plot generated negligible runoff and erosion (0.5 mm, 0.2 Mg ha^–1) compared with CTBF (323 mm, 547 Mg ha^–1). Frost occurred more frequently and was deeper in CTBF, probably due to its lack of residue and shallower snow depth. The modified WEPP model could reasonably reproduce major winter processes, yet it cannot represent all the complicated winter phenomena observed in the field. Continued efforts are needed to further improve the ability of WEPP to properly account for soil freeze–thaw and thus transient soil hydraulic properties and hydrologic and erosion processes.

Abbreviations: CTBF, continuous tilled bare fallow • NT, no-till • WEPP, Water Erosion Prediction Project

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. R. Nimmo, B. J. Andraski, and R. Munoz-Carpena UZIG USGS Research: Advances through Interdisciplinary Interaction Vadose Zone J., May 21, 2009; 8(2): 411 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]