Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Vadose Zone Journal Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gribb, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by McNamara, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The Effect of Various Soil Hydraulic Property Estimates on Soil Moisture Simulations

Molly M. Gribba,*, Irina Forkutsaa, Aleshia Hansena, David G. Chandlerb and James P. McNamarac

a Dep. of Civil Engineering, Boise State Univ., 1910 University Dr., Boise, ID 83725-2075
b Dep. of Civil Engineering, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506
c Dep. of Geosciences, Boise State Univ., 1910 University Dr., Boise, ID 83725-1535

Correspondence: * Corresponding author (mgribb{at}boisestate.edu).

Received for publication 27 April 2008. Models of water movement in unsaturated soils require accurate representations of the soil moisture retention and hydraulic conductivity curves; however, commonly used laboratory methods and pedotransfer functions (PTFs) are rarely verified against field conditions. In this study, we investigated the effects of using soil hydraulic property information obtained from different measurement and estimation techniques on one-dimensional model predictions of soil moisture content. Pairs of time domain reflectometry waveguides and tensiometers were installed at two depths in the side of a soil pit face to obtain in situ measurements. Undisturbed soil samples were taken near the instruments and subjected to particle size analysis, multistep outflow (MSO), and falling-head permeability tests to obtain estimates of the soil moisture retention curves. Three scaling methods were then applied to improve the fit of the various estimates to the field data. We found that soil hydraulic property estimates obtained from inverse methods lead to the best simulations of soil moisture dynamics, and that laboratory MSO tests or commonly used PTFs perform poorly. These laboratory and PTF estimates can be dramatically improved, however, by simply constraining the range of possible moisture contents to the minimum and maximum measured in the field. It appears that this method of scaling PTF results can be used to obtain soil hydraulic property inputs of sufficient accuracy for plot-scale modeling efforts without requiring expensive laboratory or in situ tests.

Abbreviations: DOY, day of the year • MR, mean residual • MSO, multistep outflow • PTF, pedotransfer function • RB, Rawls and Brakensiek (1985) • TDR, time domain reflectometry • WOE, Wösten et al. (1999)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
T. J. Kelleners, D. G. Chandler, J. P. McNamara, M. M. Gribb, and M. S. Seyfried
Modeling the Water and Energy Balance of Vegetated Areas with Snow Accumulation
Vadose Zone J., November 17, 2009; 8(4): 1013 - 1030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Soil Science Society of America