Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Srivastava, P. Articles by Barnett, M. O. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Fate and Transport of Sulfadimethoxine and Ormetoprim in Two Southeastern United States Soils

^a Biosystems Engineering, 200 Corley Bldg., Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849-5417
^b Agronomy and Soils Dep., 201 Funchess Hall, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849-5412
^c Alabama Dep. of Agriculture and Industries, 1445 Federal Dr., Montgomery, AL 36107
^d Civil Engineering Dep., 208 Harbert Engineering Center, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849-5337

Correspondence: ^* Corresponding author (srivapu{at}auburn.edu).

Received for publication 20 December 2007. There have been increasing concerns regarding antimicrobial contaminants in the environment. To date, limited research exists regarding the fate and transport of these compounds in the environment once they have been discharged in human and animal wastes. The fate and transport of two antimicrobials, sulfadimethoxine (SDM) and ormetoprim (OMP), were investigated in two soils and a sand using miscible pulse and step displacement column studies. Because OMP and SDM are often administered in combination, their fate and transport were investigated individually as single solutes as well as in combination as cosolutes. The transport of SDM and OMP was modeled by the chemical nonequilibrium model of the convection–dispersion equation. Sorption of SDM in soils and sand was found to be weak (i.e., it readily desorbed); OMP was sorbed more strongly and required more time for desorption. Results for the pulse input columns yielded mass recoveries >0.90 for the sand and two soils with SDM and for the sand with OMP. Mass recoveries of OMP in the two soils were 0.56 and 0.55, respectively, indicating irreversible sorption or chemical transformation. Comparisons of single-solute and cosolute column studies of OMP and SDM indicate that sorption and transport of these compounds in mixtures were not considerably different from their individual sorption and transport. Overall, the results from this study indicate that both compounds have the potential to move through soils, contaminating nearby surface waters and groundwater.

Abbreviations: OMP, ormetoprim • SDM, sulfadimethoxine