Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Vadose Zone Journal Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goswami, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Clement, T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Estimating Errors in Concentration Measurements Obtained from Image Analysis

R. R. Goswamia,c, B. Ambaleb and T. P. Clementa,*

a Dep. of Civil Engineering, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849
b Dep. of Electrical Engineering, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849
c current address: Geosyntec Consultants, Boca Raton, FL 33487

Correspondence: * Corresponding author (clement{at}auburn.edu).

Received for publication 23 March 2008. Image analysis (IA) techniques are increasingly being used in porous media experiments to measure system properties such as concentration and water content. The values of system properties estimated using IA techniques can be influenced by various types of experimental errors. These errors are generally quantified by using global mass balance calculations or by comparing the dispersion coefficient value obtained from the IA data against an accepted value. We used a theoretical test problem to show that both of these error quantification methods have severe limitations. Hence, we developed an alternative statistics-based method for quantifying IA errors. The applicability of the new method was verified using the theoretical test problem. In addition to quantifying errors, the method can also be used as a design tool for selecting optimal concentration ranges for conducting contaminant transport experiments with minimal errors. We conducted a dense-tracer transport experiment to demonstrate the use of the proposed error analysis method.

Abbreviations: CRE, calibration-relationship error • EE, experimental error • IA, image analysis • LTM, light transmission method







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Soil Science Society of America