Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Vadose Zone Journal Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pang, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hector, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Modeling Transport of Microbes in Ten Undisturbed Soils under Effluent Irrigation

Liping Panga,*, Malcolm McLeodb, Jacqueline Aislabieb, Jirka Simunekc, Murray Closea and Ross Hectora

a Institute of Environmental Science & Research Ltd, P.O. Box 29181, Christchurch, New Zealand
b Landcare Research, Private Bag 3127, Hamilton, New Zealand
c Dep. of Environmental Sciences, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92507

Correspondence: * Corresponding author (Liping.pang{at}esr.cri.nz).

Received for publication 8 June 2007. The HYDRUS-1D mobile–immobile water model (MIM) was used to evaluate the transport of fecal coliforms, Salmonella bacteriophage, and Br in 10 soils. At a flux of 5 mm h–1, a pulse of dairy shed effluent was applied to 30 large undisturbed lysimeters, followed by water irrigation. Soil types included clayey gley soil, clay loam, silt loam, silt loam over gravels, fine sandy loam, dune sand soil, pumice soil, and allophanic soil. Except for dune sand, modeling results showed lower mobile water contents and dispersivities for microbes than for Br, indicating the exclusion of microbes from smaller pores. The MIM-derived removal rates were in the order: volcanic soils > greywacke-derived silt loams > granular young sandy soils, and were the most variable in clayey gley loam and silt loam over gravels. Microbial reduction was 100% in allophanic soil, 16 to 18 log m–1 in pumice soil (where the unit log is the log10 reduction in maximum concentration compared with the original concentration), and was lowest in clayey gley soil (0.1–2 log m–1). For most of the other soils, the reduction was 2 to 3 log m–1, except for 9 to 10 log m–1 for fecal coliforms in a fine sandy loam. The detachment rate was only 1% of the attachment rate, indicating irreversible attachment of microbes. Soil structure (macroporosity) appeared to play the most important role in the transport of microbes and Br, while soil lithology had the greatest influence on attenuation and mass exchange. The general pattern of predicted mobile water content agrees with the measured macroporosity, which is positively related to leaching vulnerability but negatively related to dispersivity.

Abbreviations: BTC, breakthrough curve • cfu, colony-forming unit, a unit indicating the number of bacteria present in a water sample • DSE, dairy-shed effluent • PV, pore volume




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
L. Pang
Microbial Removal Rates in Subsurface Media Estimated From Published Studies of Field Experiments and Large Intact Soil Cores
J. Environ. Qual., June 23, 2009; 38(4): 1531 - 1559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Soil Science Society of America