Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Callegary, J. B. Articles by Groom, R. W. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Vertical Spatial Sensitivity and Exploration Depth of Low-Induction-Number Electromagnetic-Induction Instruments

^a U.S. Geological Survey, 520 N. Park Ave., Tucson, AZ 85719
^b Hydrology and Water Resources, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
^c PetRos EiKon, Inc., 222 Snidercroft Rd., Concord, ON L4K 2K1, Canada

Correspondence: ^* Corresponding author (jcallega{at}usgs.gov)

Received for publication 25 August 2006. Vertical spatial sensitivity and effective depth of exploration (d_e) of low-induction-number (LIN) instruments over a layered soil were evaluated using a complete numerical solution to Maxwell's equations. Previous studies using approximate mathematical solutions predicted a vertical spatial sensitivity for instruments operating under LIN conditions that, for a given transmitter–receiver coil separation (s), coil orientation, and transmitter frequency, should depend solely on depth below the land surface. When not operating under LIN conditions, vertical spatial sensitivity and d_e also depend on apparent soil electrical conductivity (_a) and therefore the induction number (ß). In this new evaluation, we determined the range of _a and ß values for which the LIN conditions hold and how d_e changes when they do not. Two-layer soil models were simulated with both horizontal (HCP) and vertical (VCP) coplanar coil orientations. Soil layers were given electrical conductivity values ranging from 0.1 to 200 mS m^–1. As expected, d_e decreased as _a increased. Only the least electrically conductive soil produced the d_e expected when operating under LIN conditions. For the VCP orientation, this was 1.6s, decreasing to 0.8s in the most electrically conductive soil. For the HCP orientation, d_e decreased from 0.76s to 0.51s. Differences between this and previous studies are attributed to inadequate representation of skin-depth effect and scattering at interfaces between layers. When using LIN instruments to identify depth to water tables, interfaces between soil layers, and variations in salt or moisture content, it is important to consider the dependence of d_e on _a.

Abbreviations: FEM, frequency-domain electromagnetic-induction • HCP, horizontal coplanar • LIN, low-induction-number • VCP, vertical coplanar

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Martinez, K. Vanderlinden, R. Ordonez, and J. L. Muriel Can Apparent Electrical Conductivity Improve the Spatial Characterization of Soil Organic Carbon? Vadose Zone J., July 7, 2009; 8(3): 586 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Saey, D. Simpson, H. Vermeersch, L. Cockx, and M. Van Meirvenne Comparing the EM38DD and DUALEM-21S Sensors for Depth-to-Clay Mapping Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 21, 2009; 73(1): 7 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Robinson, H. Abdu, S. B. Jones, M. Seyfried, I. Lebron, and R. Knight Eco-Geophysical Imaging of Watershed-Scale Soil Patterns Links with Plant Community Spatial Patterns Vadose Zone J., October 29, 2008; 7(4): 1132 - 1138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Robinson, C. S. Campbell, J. W. Hopmans, B. K. Hornbuckle, S. B. Jones, R. Knight, F. Ogden, J. Selker, and O. Wendroth Soil Moisture Measurement for Ecological and Hydrological Watershed-Scale Observatories: A Review Vadose Zone J., February 25, 2008; 7(1): 358 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]