Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vanderborght, J. Articles by Vereecken, H. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

One-Dimensional Modeling of Transport in Soils with Depth-Dependent Dispersion, Sorption and Decay

Agrosphere, ICG-IV Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D 52425 Jülich, Germany

Correspondence: ^* Corresponding author (j.vanderborght{at}fz-juelich.de)

Received for publication 21 July 2006. Macroscopic spatial variations in advection velocity lead to an increase in dispersion with increasing travel distance or depth. In soils, this increase goes along with a decrease in decay and sorption of organic substances. We used three different one-dimensional models that make different assumptions about the dispersion process to compare predicted leaching in a 1-m-deep soil profile with layers with different sorption and decay parameters. The first two convective–dispersive models assume that dispersion results from microscopic variations in solute particle velocities that are not correlated across soil layer boundaries. The third model, a stream tube model (STM), assumes that the particle velocity remains constant along its trajectory and is perfectly correlated in different layers. The three models were parameterized to predict the same inert tracer breakthrough curve (BTC) at 1-m depth. The first convective–dispersive model assumes a constant dispersion coefficient ("homogeneous" convection–dispersion equation [CDE]). The second model uses different dispersion coefficients in the different layers ("layered" CDE) to predict the same inert tracer BTCs as the STM at the layer boundaries. Despite similar predictions of inert tracer BTCs, the models predicted different BTCs of reactive substances at 1-m depth. The different predictions by the STM and layered CDE illustrate the importance of the correlation of solute particle velocities in different soil layers. They also point to a fundamental problem related to the use of a CDE with a depth-dependent dispersion to mimic a dispersion process caused by macroscopic variations in particle velocities.

Abbreviations: BTC, breakthrough curve • CDE, convection–dispersion equation • STM, stream tube model

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Vereecken, P. Burauel, J. Groeneweg, E. Klumpp, W. Mittelstaedt, H.-D. Narres, T. Putz, J. van der Kruk, J. Vanderborght, and F. Wendland Research at the Agrosphere Institute: From the Process Scale to the Catchment Scale Vadose Zone J., August 11, 2009; 8(3): 664 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Koestel, J. Vanderborght, M. Javaux, A. Kemna, A. Binley, and H. Vereecken Noninvasive 3-D Transport Characterization in a Sandy Soil Using ERT: 2. Transport Process Inference Vadose Zone J., August 11, 2009; 8(3): 723 - 734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]