Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Vadose Zone Journal Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lazarovitch, N.
Right arrow Articles by Simunek, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Subsurface Water Distribution from Drip Irrigation Described by Moment Analyses

N. Lazarovitcha,*, A. W. Warrickb, A. Furmanc and J. Simunekd

a Wyler Dep. of Dryland Agriculture, Jacob Blaustein Inst. for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion Univ. of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84990, Israel
b Soil Water and Environmental Science, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
c Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, 50250 Israel
d Dep. of Environmental Science, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521

Correspondence: * Corresponding author (lazarovi{at}bgu.ac.il)

Received for publication 31 March 2006. Moment analysis techniques are used to describe spatial and temporal subsurface wetting patterns resulting from drip emitters. The water added is considered a "plume" with the zeroth moment representing the total volume of water applied. The first moments lead to the location of the center of the plume, and the second moments relate to the amount of spreading about the mean position. We tested this approach with numerically generated data for infiltration from surface and buried line and point sources in three contrasting soils. Ellipses (in two dimensions) or ellipsoids (in three dimensions) can be depicted about the center of the plume. Any fraction of water added can be related to a "probability" curve relating the size of the ellipse (or ellipsoid) that contains that amount of water. Remarkably, the probability curves are identical for all times and all of the contrasting soils. The consistency of the probability relationships can be exploited to pinpoint the extent of subsurface water for any fraction of the volume added. The new method can be immediately applied to the vital question of how many sensors are needed and where to install them to capture the overall water distribution under drip irrigation. For example, better agreement with the "exact" solution occurs with increasing the number of observation points from 6 to 9 and no significant improvement when increasing from 9 to 16. The method can also be applied to parameter estimation of soil hydraulic properties, which we uniquely reproduced for generated data.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
J. Simunek, M. Th. van Genuchten, and M. Sejna
Development and Applications of the HYDRUS and STANMOD Software Packages and Related Codes
Vadose Zone J., May 27, 2008; 7(2): 587 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Soil Science Society of America