Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Vadose Zone Journal Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (24)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heimovaara, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bouten, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Published in Vadose Zone Journal 3:1128-1145 (2004)
© 2004 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA


SPECIAL SECTION: HYDROGEOPHYSICS

Obtaining the Spatial Distribution of Water Content along a TDR Probe Using the SCEM-UA Bayesian Inverse Modeling Scheme

Timo J. Heimovaaraa,*, Johan A. Huismanb,c, Jasper A. Vrugtb and Willem Boutenb

a Royal Haskoning, P.O. Box 8520, 3009 AM Rotterdam, The Netherlands
b Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
c Institute for Landscape Ecology and Resource Management, Justus Liebig University, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, D-35392 Giessen, Germany

Correspondence: * Corresponding author (T.Heimovaara{at}RoyalHaskoning.com)

Received for publication 13 May 2004. Time domain reflectometry (TDR) has become one of the standard methods for the measurement of the temporal and spatial distribution of water saturation in soils. Current waveform analysis methodology gives a measurement of the average water content along the length of the TDR probe. Close inspection of TDR waveforms shows that heterogeneity in water content along the probe can be seen in the TDR waveform. We present a comprehensive approach to TDR waveform analysis that gives a quantitative estimate of the dielectric permittivity profile along the length of the probe and, therefore, the distribution of water content. The approach is based on the combination of a multisection scatter function model for the TDR measurement system with the shuffled complex evolution Metropolis algorithm (SCEM-UA). This combined approach allows for the estimation of the 40 parameters in the transmission line model using a series of simple calibration measurements. The proof of concept is given with measurements in a layered system consisting of air and water. Finally, TDR waveforms from layered soil samples were analyzed to estimate the distribution of the water content along the length of the probe. Results show that the proposed method provides much more reproducible results than obtained with the traditional travel time method. Because the proposed method can be fully automated, it increases the applicability of the TDR method, especially in applications where detailed (real-time) data are required on heterogeneous infiltration.

Abbreviations: MSSF, multi-section scatter function • SCEM-UA, shuffled complex evolution Metropolis algorithm • SR, scale-reduction [score] • TDR, time domain reflectometry




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
J. Mertens, G. Kahl, B. Gottesburen, and J. Vanderborght
Inverse Modeling of Pesticide Leaching in Lysimeters: Local versus Global and Sequential Single-Objective versus Multiobjective Approaches
Vadose Zone J., August 11, 2009; 8(3): 793 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
X. Shuai, O. Wendroth, C. Lu, and C. Ray
Reducing the Complexity of Inverse Analysis of Time Domain Reflectometry Waveforms
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 21, 2009; 73(1): 28 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
J. A. Vrugt, P. H. Stauffer, Th. Wohling, B. A. Robinson, and V. V. Vesselinov
Inverse Modeling of Subsurface Flow and Transport Properties: A Review with New Developments
Vadose Zone J., May 27, 2008; 7(2): 843 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
C. P. Oden, G. R. Olhoeft, D. L. Wright, and M. H. Powers
Measuring the Electrical Properties of Soil Using a Calibrated Ground-Coupled GPR System
Vadose Zone J., February 25, 2008; 7(1): 171 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
Z. Fan and F. X. M. Casey
Estimating Solute Transport Parameters Using Stochastic Ranking Evolutionary Strategy
Vadose Zone J., January 23, 2008; 7(1): 124 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S. D. Logsdon
Experimental Limitations of Time Domain Reflectometry Hardware for Dispersive Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 27, 2006; 70(2): 537 - 540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
J.-P. Laurent, P. Ruelle, L. Delage, A. Zairi, B. B. Nouna, and T. Adjmi
Monitoring Soil Water Content Profiles with a Commercial TDR System: Comparative Field Tests and Laboratory Calibration
Vadose Zone J., November 11, 2005; 4(4): 1030 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S. D. Logsdon
Soil Dielectric Spectra from Vector Network Analyzer Data
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 2, 2005; 69(4): 983 - 989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
H. Vereecken, S. Hubbard, A. Binley, and T. Ferre
Hydrogeophysics: An Introduction from the Guest Editors
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2004; 3(4): 1060 - 1062.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Soil Science Society of America