Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Vadose Zone Journal Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lambot, S.
Right arrow Articles by Vanclooster, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Published in Vadose Zone Journal 3:1072-1081 (2004)
© 2004 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA


SPECIAL SECTION: HYDROGEOPHYSICS

Electromagnetic Inversion of GPR Signals and Subsequent Hydrodynamic Inversion to Estimate Effective Vadose Zone Hydraulic Properties

S. Lambota,*, M. Antoinea, I. van den Boschb, E. C. Slobc and M. Vancloostera

a Department of Environmental Sciences and Land Use Planning, Catholic University of Louvain, Croix du Sud 2, Box 2, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
b Microwave Laboratory, Catholic University of Louvain, Place du Levant 3, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
c Department of Geotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Mijnbouwstraat 120, 2628 RX Delft, The Netherlands

Correspondence: * Corresponding author (lambot{at}geru.ucl.ac.be)

Received for publication 14 January 2004. We combine electromagnetic inversion of ground penetrating radar (GPR) signals with hydrodynamic inverse modeling to identify the effective soil hydraulic properties of a sand in laboratory conditions. Ground penetrating radar provides soil moisture time series that are subsequently used as input in the hydrodynamic inverse procedure. The technique relies on an ultrawide band (UWB) stepped frequency continuous wave (SFCW) radar combined with an off-ground monostatic transverse electromagnetic (TEM) horn antenna. Ground penetrating radar signal forward modeling is based on the exact solution of the three-dimensional Maxwell equations for describing free wave propagation and on linear systems in series and parallel for describing wave propagation in the antenna. Water flow in the sand is described by the one-dimensional Richards equation using the Mualem–van Genuchten parameterization. Both model inversions are formulated by the classical least-squares problem and are performed iteratively using advanced global optimization techniques. Compared with time domain reflectometry (TDR), results demonstrated the appropriateness of the GPR integrated approach to measure soil moisture remotely. In particular, the approach was found to be less sensitive to the inherent small-scale heterogeneities. Hydrodynamic inversion of soil moisture data led to hydraulic parameters agreeing reasonably well with direct measurements. The observed discrepancies were attributed to the different characterization scales and samples. The overall integrated approach offers great promise to map the effective hydraulic properties of the shallow subsurface at a high spatial resolution.

Abbreviations: GMCS, global multilevel coordinate search • GPR, ground penetrating radar • MVG, Mualem–van Genuchten model • NMS, Nelder–Mead simplex • SFCW, stepped frequency continuous wave • TDR, time domain reflectometry • TEM, transverse electromagnetic • UWB, ultrawide band • VNA, vector network analyzer




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
S. Lambot, E. Slob, J. Rhebergen, O. Lopera, K. Z. Jadoon, and H. Vereecken
Remote Estimation of the Hydraulic Properties of a Sand Using Full-Waveform Integrated Hydrogeophysical Inversion of Time-Lapse, Off-Ground GPR Data
Vadose Zone J., August 11, 2009; 8(3): 743 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
D. Rucker
A Coupled Electrical Resistivity-Infiltration Model for Wetting Front Evaluation
Vadose Zone J., April 14, 2009; 8(2): 383 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
M. B. Farmani, N.-O. Kitterod, and H. Keers
Estimation of Unsaturated Flow Parameters Using GPR Tomography and Groundwater Table Data
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2008; 7(4): 1239 - 1252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
A. Saintenoy, S. Schneider, and P. Tucholka
Evaluating Ground Penetrating Radar Use for Water Infiltration Monitoring
Vadose Zone J., February 25, 2008; 7(1): 208 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
S. Finsterle and M. B. Kowalsky
Joint Hydrological-Geophysical Inversion for Soil Structure Identification
Vadose Zone J., February 25, 2008; 7(1): 287 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
H. Vereecken, S. Hubbard, A. Binley, and T. Ferre
Hydrogeophysics: An Introduction from the Guest Editors
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2004; 3(4): 1060 - 1062.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Soil Science Society of America